New Testament Restoration Foundation - Restoring New Testament Practices to Today's Church
Home
About Us
Beliefs
Publications
Workshops
Answers For Catholics
Links
Search
Good Reading
Guest Book
News
Email Us

The Constitutional Defects

of the Radical Personality

By Dan Trotter
In this chapter we will direct our attention towards a serious problem within the house church movement: the constitutional defects of the radical personality.

House church Christianity is alternative Christianity, and alternative Christianity attracts alternative Christians.  People who never ask why, who are content with mindless ritual, who are theological yes-men, are not going to leave the institutional church for radical home church Christianity.  This means that people in our movement tend to be free spirits.  The result is that home churches are rarely bland: they are usually very, very good, or very, very bad, in terms of their disposition.

Before we look at the downside of the radical personality, let’s appreciate what’s good.  Radical NT Christians tend to be extremely devoted to the person of Christ, and very devoted to one another in brotherly love.  They have to be if they are going to survive in a house church environment.  They tend to be seeking individuals, because they don’t have a priestly caste to teach them how to live spiritual lives.  House church Christians are generally happy with life.  Their families are robust, and they are pleasant people to be around.  So please remember this as some personality problems are dealt with.

 There are essentially six negative personality traits that threaten to afflict those who are in this movement: cynicism, pessimism, discontent, perfectionism, weirdness, and hyperintensity.
1) Cynicism.  A house church Christian is, by definition a radical, at least in terms of twentieth century American Christianity.  (Actually, in one sense, a house church Christian is very conservative – “radical” comes from the Latin word radix, which means “root.”  This means house church advocates want to go back to the church’s roots: the way the church was when the church was still young.)  Because the radical NT Christian has examined just about every aspect of modern conservative Christian life there is, and rejected about ninety percent of it, he has become used to rejecting things.  This can get to be a habit.  Pretty soon, the radical Christian is rejecting things that shouldn’t be rejected: submission to authority, for example.  Because of the heavy-handed tyranny exercised by so many (not all) pastor-popes, the radical Christian tends to look at legitimate authority cynically, judges the authority’s motives, assumes the authority is a creep, and refuses to listen to him.
 It’s hard not to be cynical when you are radical.  You look around, and pastors are preaching sermons of “faithfulness,” and you know their budget’s hurting, and you know their primary interest is not your spiritual well-being.  You see preachers all hot and lathered about God’s latest move, and you know it’s nothing but their flesh at best, or a con at worst.  No matter how bad it is out there, my fellow house churchers, there is no excuse for cynicism.  Cynicism is self-defeating.  After you have finished being cynical about the institutional church, you’ll then start being cynical about your brothers and sisters, then yourself.  You might even become cynical about God letting all the nonsense go on.

One of the most radical figures in history was Jesus Christ, and I see nothing to indicate He was a cynic.  His religious system was a lot worse than ours, but He was focused on a better kingdom.  We want to stay away from sourpuss radical Christianity.  There’s nothing worse.
 2) Pessimism.  Closely allied with cynicism is pessimism.  You don’t have to be in the church-in-the-home movement long to get very discouraged.  Your institutional friends humor you, and think you have a “pet doctrine,” or that you’re going through some kind of stage.  You scour your home town for kindred spirits, and are lucky to find one.  Worse, you constantly run into people who get all excited about house church, but won’t lift a finger to get involved.  Pretty soon, you start getting sour on the future.

A pessimist is doomed from the start.  A house church Puddleglum will never see the bride in her NT purity.  He will spend his whole life bemoaning the sad state of the institutional church, but he will resign himself to the awful fact that there will never be anything better.  The church will never be restored with this kind of thinking.  I am more aware than most of the terrible difficulties involved in getting involved in house church, but I have hope.  It looks impossible, but I have hope.  I have to.  I’m not going back to the institutional church.

3) Discontent.  Radical Christians are more often than not very discontent.  Many of them are still within the institutional church, having damaged their integrity and their peace of mind by making those thousands of excuses that keep them in a situation in which they have no business being.  One wonders who is more to blame: the institutional church for being so awful, or the radical Christian for not having the fortitude to leave.  These radical brethren will always be discontent, and there’s no helping them, until they come out.

On the other hand, the radical Christian who has come out is often just as discontent as his like-minded brother who has stayed in.  He may be naive, and think that doing house church is a simple matter of getting some brothers and sisters together for meetings in a living room.  As you know, nothing could be further from the truth.  When the new wears off, and the honeymoon is over, and the marriage begins, many radical Christians are shocked at the hard reality of learning to have the cross operate in their lives through the agency of their brethren.  These naive Christians will continue to look for the perfect “meeting,” or for some magical answer to the problem of their unhappiness.  Words like covenant, and community, and commitment are alien to them.  With their minds focused on the horrors of their past lives in the system, they are unable to focus on the hard task at hand of establishing the kingdom.  And so they remain discontent.

4) Perfectionism.  Closely allied to discontentedness is perfectionism.  Since radical Christians are by their nature critics of the status quo, it is very easy for them to forget how difficult it is, in this grubby world, to even maintain an imperfect status quo.  It might do us all some good every now and then to stop and ponder that even though what we’re doing is a whale of a lot better than the institutional alternative, that with which we are replacing the institutional church is far from perfect, and, in fact, will never even be close.  I recently heard of a brother who slammed the door as he walked out of a house church on his way back to the system.  His beef: the sharing wasn’t mutually edifying enough, and the elders of the church weren’t chastising people enough for not edifying one another properly.  People like this are hard to please.  Personally, I wouldn’t bother trying.

5) Weirdness.  The institutional church thrives on a conformist mentality.  You wear the right clothes, you believe the right denominational doctrines, you read the right books, you listen to the right speakers, and you never disagree with the pastor-pope.  When the radical Christian escapes this stultifying nothingness, he is pat to feel giddy with “freedom.”  The next thing you know, he refuses to go to his kinfolk’s weddings and baptisms, he’s spitting tobacco juice on the plush carpets of his local Protestant temple, he’s decided to quit paying taxes (which is alright, because he’s not working anymore to have any income to pay taxes on, because he’s too busy “seeking God” to actually work).  He begins to exhibit the social graces of a donkey with B.O.  I don’t know what the answer is, except to show a lot of grace.  But hey, how can you criticize anyone for being weird?  After all, you read Toward A House Church Theology!

6) Hyperintensity.  This is a besetting fault of all radicals, not just house church Christians.  On one hand, it is easy to understand the intensity of one who has caught a hold of the radical NT church vision.  It’s so refreshing, so exciting, so different, and why hasn’t anyone told me about this before?  But ideology is never a substitute for relationships with people.  If people aren’t going to listen to you, Jesus has a free word of advice:  “Shut up.”  Didn’t he say to not cast our pearls before swine?  You can tell when people are ready to listen to you:  they are so hungry, they practically beg you to tell them about church.  You don’t need to aggravate those who aren’t interested.

We need to take the time and enjoy the “unbought graces of life.”  The Southern agrarians hated Northern radicals, and one reason was their propensity to spend all of their lives trying to remake the world without spending any time trying to enjoy it.  House church radicals need to relax and remember: we can still have fun in this life, even though the Constantinian abomination we view with disgust will exist as long as we do.  So what.  When you find a Christian still in the system, quit worrying about the sad fact that he is still in the system, and find something exciting and interesting about your brother.  You’ll be a lot happier, and a whole lot less frustrated. 
 
 

 
~ New Testament Restoration Foundation ~
2752 Evans Dale Circle
Atlanta, GA 30340