One Man 
        - 
        
 
 
        
or One 
        Another?
        by Tom Elseroad & Eric Svendsen 
        
The New Testament 
        indicates that all believers are important in the body of Christ (Ro 
        12:3; 1 Co 12:4-31), and that “each part” has a role to fulfill (Eph 
        4:16). In the church assembly all should have the opportunity to 
        contribute something toward the mutual edification of one another (Ro 
        15:14; 1 Th 4:18; 5:11-14; Heb 3:12-13), that is, equipping, 
        admonishing, comforting, and encouraging each other. 
        
In Heb 10:24-25 the believers are to “consider how we may spur one 
        another on toward love and good deeds” in their assemblies.  In the 
        context of spiritual gifts (Ro 12:1-8) all believers are given gifts (v 
        6), some of which should be prominent in the assembly (vv 7,11,18) so 
        that all may contribute in the edification of the body (v 7). 
        
 Clearly then, in the early church all were to be involved in 
        the assembly in some way, for if one was missing the whole body would be 
        affected (1 Co 12: 14-26).  In today’s traditional churches it is 
        common practice that one man, usually called “the pastor,” uses his gift 
        before a congregation which must sit back and passively listen to his 
        message.  But where in all this is the mutual edification of “one 
        another”(Heb 10:24-25)?  How can all believers function within the 
        body if only one person is allowed to use his gift?  It is the 
        purpose of this chapter to probe the New Testament in order to find out 
        just why the early church practiced mutual edification, and thus in turn 
        to see how this applies to our churches today.  Let’s consider a 
        few relevant passages. 
        
In Eph 4:11-16 we see that “each part” has a job to do (v 16).  
        In v 11 a list of church leaders is given.  He gave some to be 
        apostles, prophets, evangelists, and “pastors and teachers” (one person 
        in Greek).  Traditionally the pastor-teacher is said to be 
        responsible for what is stated in vv 12-13; that is, “For the equipping 
        of the saints for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body 
        of Christ, till we all come to the unity of the faith . . .” 
        (NKJV).  Thus it seems from this passage that the pastor-teacher 
        has three tasks to perform: 1) equipping the saints, 2) the work of the 
        ministry, and 3) the edifying of the body of Christ.  However, 
        though the pastor-teacher does indeed have a part in these activities, 
        the rendering before us may mislead.  In 4:12 the word “for” occurs 
        three times in our English text.  But in the Greek text the 
        preposition changes.  Whereas the English is rendered “for,” the 
        Greek reads pros . . . eis . . . eis.  Thus the text is 
        stating the purpose for equipping the saints (“so that they can do the 
        work of the ministry”) which will in turn result in the entire body 
        being built up.  This is to go on until we all  come to the 
        unity of the faith – in essence, throughout the present age. 
        
In too many churches today the pastor-teacher attempts to perform 
        these important tasks alone.  But, biblically speaking, his job is 
        merely to prepare the saints so that they can do the work of the 
        ministry and thus build up the body of Christ.  We find that same 
        truth in 4:16–“From him the whole body, joined and held together by 
        every supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love, as each 
        part does its work.”  One person should not be given the whole load 
        of responsibility, and, indeed, the New Testament bears this out. 
        
In 1 Co 12 spiritual gifts come into view.  Several points are 
        worth mentioning about this passage.  First of all, spiritual gifts 
        are given to believers by God (vv 11, 18, 28).  Second, we see that 
        each believer is given a gift (vv 6, 7, 11, see also 14:3-5, 1 Pe 
        4:8-11).  Third, these gifts are given in order to edify the church 
        (v 7, see also 14:3-5; 1 Pe 4:8-11).  Fourth, there are different 
        kinds of gifts (vv 17, 21-23, see also Ro 12:4-5; Eph 4:15-16).  
        Fifth, the main point of this chapter is that every gift is needed 
        (12:7, 21-23; Ro 12:4-5; Eph 4:15).  We cannot miss this.  It 
        is important that all believers use their gift(s) in order that the body 
        might function as a body. 
        
Some gifts are normally considered non-assembly gifts; that is, gifts 
        used in everyday experiences, not necessarily during the time that the 
        church gathers together (e.g. “mercy,” Ro 12:8; “faith,” 1 Co 12:9; and 
        others).  But surely we are to use  whatever gifts we have 
        within the context of everyday life (not merely once per week), and even 
        the gifts just mentioned may be demonstrated during the assembly 
        time.  Furthermore, there are a number of gifts that are 
        specifically mentioned in 1 Co 12-14 that are to be exercised within the 
        assembly, not the least of which is prophecy–something anyone could do 
        (14:31)–yet these gifts are rarely (if ever) exercised in today’s 
        assembly.  Why is this?  The problem probably stems from the 
        overall structure of today’s churches.  Most churches do not allow 
        for all believers (any believer?) in the assembly to participate.  
        Indeed, any attempt to do so is the quickest way to be ushered out of 
        the assembly!  One possible exception to this is congregational 
        singing.  But even here it is highly structured and 
        regulated.  There is certainly no room for unscheduled and 
        spontaneous praise or singing.  As it is, the believers in the 
        congregation are merely spectators who watch the leaders of the church 
        perform.  Worse, Christians are instructed not to “interrupt the 
        service” and are assured that quiescence is their proper place. 
        
 In 1 Co 14 Paul gives us a picture of the church assembly in 
        Corinth.  In the context of those times when “the whole church 
        comes together” (v 23), it is apparent that anyone could contribute a 
        psalm, a teaching, a revelation, or an interpretation (v 26).  All 
        of these things were to be done in order to strengthen the church.  
        In verse 29 we are told that “two or three prophets should speak, and 
        the others should weigh carefully what is said.”  Since prophecy is 
        highly regarded by Paul for its valuable contribution to the edification 
        of the body (14:3-5, 12, 26), and since later he says that “all can 
        prophesy one by one” (v 31), it seems best to take verse 29 to mean at 
        least “two or three” (in contrast to the tongue speakers who were to be 
        at the most two or three in number).  Although it is not our 
        purpose here to teach on prophecy, one thing may be certain: prophecy 
        was not the preparation and preaching of a sermon (as is often supposed) 
        but rather a “revelation” that could come to someone while someone else 
        was speaking (v 30).  Wayne Grudem (The Gift of Prophecy in the New 
        Testament and Today) has argued convincingly that prophecy is an insight 
        that is given by God to edify the body.  The point is that there is 
        to be mutual interaction–anyone who wants to is supposed to be able to 
        participate in this.  Sadly, this is the very thing that is 
        suppressed in today’s churches.  Hence, by our rigid structures 
        which disallow such participation, we are guilty of quenching the Spirit 
        (1 Th 5:19). 
        
A biblical theology of spiritual gifts and the edification of the 
        body demands that all believers be involved.  One of the reasons 
        that the early church was so dynamic and radical is because there was 
        opportunity (indeed, expectation!) for all believers to be involved in 
        the building up of the body.  It is difficult to imagine how 
        something like this can be accomplished (the way it is supposed to be 
        accomplished) in the current setting of most churches.  The early 
        church met in small intimate groups in each other’s homes.  This 
        was surely a key ingredient to their spiritual growth.  This 
        setting fostered spontaneity as well as opportunity for the 
        participation and interaction of all believers.  There seems to be 
        no good reason not to follow this pattern, unless one wants to argue 
        that his ministry will somehow be limited in a small church. On the 
        other hand, are we really willing to trade-in the spiritual well-being 
        of the body for the fame of one man–the pastor?  
  
        
  
        
        